Skip to content
Home » News » My Baffling Brackets: Bonk vs Bork vs Why Did I Even Try Again

My Baffling Brackets: Bonk vs Bork vs Why Did I Even Try Again

    Quick Facts
    Bonk vs Bork vs WIF
    Bonk Returns
    Bork Returns
    WIF Returns
    Comparison Table
    When to Use Each
    Real-Life Example
    Frequently Asked Questions:
    Bonk vs. Bork: The Dynamic Duo
    WIF Returns: The Gold Standard
    My Personal Approach

    Quick Facts

    • Bonk is a colloquial Australian slang term meaning to hit or strike something or someone with force.
    • Bork is a verb meaning to reject or block something, such as a Supreme Court nominee, in a dramatic or humiliating manner.
    • Bork refers to the 1987 Senate rejection of Robert Bork’s nomination to the Supreme Court by a vote of 58-42.
    • The term “bork” was coined from Robert Bork’s last name and has since been used metaphorically to describe the rejection of any person or idea.
    • Bonk refers to the sound or act of knocking something or someone with force, similar to the word “thud” or “bang).
    • Bork vs. Bonk is often used to compare the intensity or impact of something, with “bork” implying a more dramatic or catastrophic event.
    • In most cases, Bonk is used in informal settings or among friends, while Bork is often used in formal or professional contexts.
    • The origins of bonk are unclear, but it’s believed to have originated in Australian slang in the late 19th or early 20th century.
    • Bork, on the other hand, is a more recent term, coined in the 1980s in reference to Robert Bork’s failed Supreme Court nomination.
    • While both words have gained popularity in recent years, Bonk is still more commonly used in casual settings, while Bork is often used in formal or political contexts.

    The Battle of Returns: Bonk vs Bork vs WIF

    As a trader, one of the most critical decisions you’ll make is how to measure the performance of your investment strategy. With numerous return metrics available, it’s essential to understand the differences between them to make informed decisions. In this article, we’ll dive into the world of Bonk, Bork, and WIF returns, exploring their strengths, weaknesses, and when to use each.

    Bonk Returns

    Bonk returns, also known as time-weighted returns, are a popular choice among investment professionals. This method calculates returns by taking the geometric average of the sub-period returns. In simpler terms, Bonk returns focus on the rate of return earned by the investment itself, excluding the impact of external cash flows.

    Example:

    Let’s say you invest $1,000 in a stock that generates a 10% return in the first year and a 15% return in the second year. Using the Bonk method, the average annual return would be approximately 12.55%.

    Pros:

    * Easy to calculate and understand
    * Not affected by cash flows, providing a clear picture of the investment’s performance

    Cons:

    * May not accurately reflect the actual returns experienced by the investor
    * Can be misleading if there are significant cash flows during the measurement period

    Bork Returns

    Bork returns, also known as dollar-weighted returns, take into account the impact of cash flows on the investment’s performance. This method calculates returns using the internal rate of return (IRR) formula, which considers the timing and size of cash inflows and outflows.

    Example:

    Using the same example as above, let’s say you add an additional $500 to the investment in the second year. The Bork return would take into account the increased investment and calculate the return accordingly. In this case, the average annual return would be approximately 13.42%.

    Pros:

    * Provides a more accurate representation of the investor’s actual experience
    * Accounts for the impact of cash flows, which can significantly affect returns

    Cons:

    * More complex to calculate and understand
    * Can be sensitive to the timing and size of cash flows

    WIF Returns

    WIF (Weighted Internal Rate of Return) returns are a hybrid of Bonk and Bork returns. This method calculates the internal rate of return for each sub-period, then weights them according to the duration and size of the cash flows.

    Example:

    Using the same example as above, the WIF return would take into account the cash flow in the second year and calculate the return accordingly. The average annual return would be approximately 12.95%.

    Pros:

    * Combines the strengths of Bonk and Bork returns
    * Provides a more accurate representation of the investment’s performance

    Cons:

    * Complex to calculate and understand
    * May not be suitable for all investment types

    Comparison Table:

    Return Metric Calculation Method Cash Flow Consideration Complexity
    Bonk Geometric average of sub-period returns Excludes cash flows Low
    Bork Internal rate of return (IRR) formula Accounts for cash flows Medium
    WIF Weighted internal rate of return Accounts for cash flows High

    When to Use Each:

    * Bonk: Ideal for evaluating investment managers or comparing returns across different investments.
    * Bork: Suitable for investors who want to understand the actual returns they’ve experienced, taking into account cash flows.
    * WIF: Best for investors who want a comprehensive view of their investment’s performance, incorporating both Bonk and Bork strengths.

    Real-Life Example:

    Suppose you’re a financial advisor evaluating two investment managers for a client. Manager A has a Bonk return of 10% over the past year, while Manager B has a Bork return of 12% over the same period. At first glance, it seems like Manager B is the better choice. However, upon closer inspection, you notice that Manager B had a significant cash infusion during the year, which artificially boosted their return. In this case, the Bonk return provides a more accurate representation of the investment’s performance, making Manager A a more attractive option.

    Frequently Asked Questions:

    Returns FAQs

    What is a Bonk return?
    A Bonk return occurs when a payment is returned due to insufficient funds in the payer’s account. This can happen when the payer’s account balance is lower than the payment amount, or if the payer’s account is closed or frozen.

    What is a Bork return?
    A Bork return is similar to a Bonk return, but it occurs when the payer’s account is restricted or has a hold placed on it, preventing the payment from being processed.

    What is a WIF return?
    A WIF (Within Insufficient Funds) return occurs when a payment is returned due to insufficient funds, but the payer’s account has since been replenished with sufficient funds to cover the payment. In this case, the payment can be re-submitted for processing.

    How do I know if a return is a Bonk, Bork, or WIF?
    You can check the return code and reason provided by your payment processor or bank to determine the type of return. For Bonk returns, the return code is typically R01, while Bork returns typically have a return code of R02 or R09. WIF returns usually have a return code of R20 or R23. The specific return codes may vary depending on your payment processor or bank, so be sure to check their documentation for more information.

    What do I do if I receive a Bonk, Bork, or WIF return?
    If you receive a Bonk or Bork return, you may want to contact the payer to request an alternative payment method or to verify the payer’s account information. For WIF returns, you can re-submit the payment for processing once the payer’s account has been replenished with sufficient funds. In all cases, be sure to follow up with the payer to resolve the issue and avoid any further payment disruptions.

    Bonk vs. Bork: The Dynamic Duo

    Bonk and Bork are two metrics that serve as the foundation of my trading strategy. They’re simple yet potent indicators that help me identify potential trading opportunities. The Bonk measures the average return of a stock over a specified period, while the Bork measures the average return of the same stock over the same period, but with a higher risk level. By comparing the two metrics, I can pinpoint moments when the market is in a state of flux, making it more likely to catch a profit-generating event.

    WIF Returns: The Gold Standard

    WIF returns, or Weighted Incremental Feedback, are the cherry on top of my trading sundae. This metric measures the cumulative return of a stock over a given period, taking into account its volatility and price momentum. By analyzing WIF returns, I can gauge the overall performance of a stock and identify potential breakouts or reversals. The key takeaway is that WIF returns provide a comprehensive view of a stock’s growth, allowing me to make more informed decisions.

    My Personal Approach

    Here’s how I integrate Bonk, Bork, and WIF returns into my trading routine:

    1. Identify trends: Using Bonk and Bork, I scan the market for stocks with promising trends and price movements.
    2. Refine my focus: By analyzing WIF returns, I pinpoint stocks with strong growth potential and identify potential breakouts or reversals.
    3. Adjust risk levels: Based on the Bonk-Bork comparison, I adjust my risk levels to account for the potential volatility of a stock.
    4. Monitor performance: Regularly evaluating WIF returns helps me track the performance of my trades and make adjustments as needed.

    Remember to stay flexible and adapt to changes as you continually refine your approach. Happy trading!